The Handy – A High-Tech Male Masturbator Overview

The Handy vs Kiiroo: Which Is the Better Male Masturbator?

Both The Handy and Kiiroo’s devices (like the Kiiroo Keon or Onyx+) aim to deliver mind-blowing automated pleasure. However, there are important differences between them. In this section, we’ll compare The Handy vs Kiiroo across various aspects – design, features, performance, and overall experience – to highlight each one’s strengths and weaknesses. We’ll especially focus on why, despite The Handy’s prowess, Kiiroo is often considered the superior choice. Whether you’re trying to decide between buying The Handy or a Kiiroo toy, or you’re just curious how they differ, this side-by-side analysis will give you clarity.

First, let’s get a quick overview with a comparison table, then we’ll dive deeper into details:

The Handy vs Kiiroo – Quick Feature Comparison Table

Now, let’s explore these points in a narrative form to really understand the user experience differences.

Design and Build: Open Versus Enclosed

One of the first differences you’ll notice is the design philosophy. The Handy uses an open strap system: picture a handheld unit with a strap on the outside that wraps around a soft sleeve. Kiiroo’s Keon (the device we’ll use for comparison since it’s Kiiroo’s closest equivalent) uses a closed-case system: picture a plastic handheld device that you insert a sleeve into, fully enclosing it.

The Handy’s Design: This open design has the advantage of flexibility. You’re not constrained by the device’s internal diameter – if a sleeve fits under the strap, you can use it. It’s also easy to remove the sleeve entirely for cleaning since it’s not inside a case. However, the drawback is that during operation, you have an external moving part. The strap and the attached sleeve move up and down visibly. This means you have to either hold the device in such a way to stabilize that movement or use it in a setup where it’s mounted. Some users hold The Handy with one hand while maybe bracing the sleeve with the other, or they lay down and let The Handy hang from the penis (it can essentially thrust itself if you find the right position). The open design can feel a bit mechanical or exposed, and possibly less “sleek” – but it gets the job done. It’s kind of like a tool that you configure each time (attach sleeve, tighten strap, etc.). The Handy is moderately compact in the sense that the unit itself isn’t huge, but once you add a long sleeve to it, the whole assembly can be as long as a Fleshlight.

Kiiroo Keon’s Design: The Keon is more like a self-contained unit. You pop the sleeve into the device, and everything is held by the device’s case. This gives it a polished look and a very ergonomic handling. You can grip the Keon like a big joystick – it’s designed to be held comfortably. There’s no external part sliding in and out (the motion happens inside the case), which can make the experience feel smoother and more immersive, since you’re not seeing the mechanism in action, you’re just feeling it. An enclosed design also means it’s more secure – you won’t have the sleeve slip out or anything because the device holds it firmly in place. It also tends to reduce noise a bit (moving parts are internal). One-handed operation is easy; you don’t have to manage an external sleeve. The downside is you can only use sleeves that fit that case. Usually that means Kiiroo’s own sleeves or ones of very similar size. So, less on-the-fly customization in that regard.

Which is better? If you value simplicity and a cohesive unit, Kiiroo’s design wins. It feels more like a consumer product, whereas The Handy, while not ugly, feels a tad more utilitarian (some liken it to a DIY machine, albeit a well-made one). From a usability perspective, beginners might find Kiiroo’s approach more intuitive – insert sleeve, go. The Handy might require a tiny bit of fiddling to get the sleeve placed right each session. However, if you appreciate versatility, The Handy’s design allows you to experiment with different sleeves easily, and even use it without a case (some enjoy the visual of seeing things in action, or even using it on different body parts creatively – an open design can adapt more).

Performance: Speed and Stroke

When it comes to raw performance, both devices are top-tier, but they have their differences. The Handy’s headline is speed – up to 600 strokes per minute, which outstrips Kiiroo Keon’s ~230 strokes per minute. In practice, 600 per minute is extremely fast. However, it’s crucial to note that at that speed, The Handy is making very short strokes (the device will reverse direction quickly so it doesn’t throw the sleeve off). So those 600 spm are short, vigorous strokes focused maybe on the head of the penis if set that way. Kiiroo’s 230 spm, while lower, can be a bit longer since it’s within a controlled case.

User Experience of Speed: Does The Handy’s higher speed make a big difference? For some, yes – if you absolutely crave that hummingbird vibration-like stroke, The Handy can do it. For many users, though, anything above 200-300 spm feels more like a blur than distinct strokes. Kiiroo’s speeds are already beyond what a human could consistently do; The Handy just pushes that envelope further. Where The Handy might have an edge is in how quickly it can ramp up and slow down due to that powerful motor – so if a script calls for a sudden burst of speed, The Handy handles it very well. Some script creators have noted that The Handy can execute very intricate patterns without lag or stutter, whereas older Kiiroo models like the Launch sometimes struggled. The Keon improved a lot and is quite smooth up to its limits, but if we talk pure hardware prowess, The Handy’s motor is arguably more potent.

Stroke Length & Motion: The Handy can do up to 4.3 inches of stroke length, which is basically full-length for many guys (covering most of the shaft). The Keon’s stroke length is around the same (the physical movement range is similar since both were designed in part by looking at the Fleshlight Launch’s spec which was around 4 inches). So both can give full strokes. The difference is, on The Handy you manually adjust how much of that you want to use. On Keon, it typically uses the full range unless the content or user input tells it not to. Both can provide very slow, sensual strokes or rapid short ones. One advantage of an enclosed system like Kiiroo’s is it feels very fluid doing full strokes (since the sleeve is held perfectly straight and aligned). With The Handy, if you don’t secure the sleeve well, extremely fast long strokes could potentially feel a bit uneven or you might worry about holding it correctly so it doesn’t wobble. But by and large, both perform excellently in delivering the sensations.

Reliability during use: At high speeds, The Handy has proven to be reliable (no stuttering thanks to the brushless motor design). Kiiroo’s Keon is also reliable within its range, but pushing it to extremes (like rapidly changing speeds) might not be as butter-smooth as The Handy’s transitions. For example, if a script is very demanding (lots of quick changes), some users noted The Handy handles it slightly better. In everyday use with moderate patterns or manual control, you probably wouldn’t notice a difference.

Intensity and Pleasure: It’s hard to quantify which “feels better” because that’s subjective. Some users actually report that beyond a certain speed, more isn’t necessarily better – it can numb you or overwhelm. Kiiroo’s top speed is already extremely intense. The Handy can go further into intensity territory that few might venture regularly. The key is that both allow you to customize intensity to your liking, but The Handy gives you a bit more headroom if you ever want to push that limit.

Connectivity and Interactive Features

Here’s where things get interesting. Both The Handy and Kiiroo shine in connectivity, but in slightly different ways.

The Handy’s Connectivity: It connects directly to WiFi, which means once it’s online, it can communicate with servers and other users without needing your phone always in the loop. For remote control, this is great – your partner just needs your device’s key and they can control it through the Handy web app. No need for you to stay on a call or anything (though you’ll likely be video chatting or talking separately for fun, but technically you don’t need to be on the same app call). The open API means there are third-party sites and tools to sync with content. Handy’s official site (handyfeeling) has a library of scripts and even a subscription service for interactive content now. The Handy team is expanding first-party interactive content support continuously.

Kiiroo’s Connectivity: Kiiroo devices typically use Bluetooth to connect to your phone, and then your phone (with the FeelConnect app) connects over the internet for remote functions or content sync. This means your phone is a bit of a middleman. The plus side is, the phone can provide a richer interface (the app can show you lots of interactive options, partner connection list, etc.). But one downside historically was connection stability – Bluetooth can sometimes drop or have latency, whereas The Handy being WiFi could be more stable. However, Kiiroo has improved the FeelConnect app significantly (FeelConnect 3.0 is much better than earlier versions). So reliability is pretty solid now.

Partner play differences: If you have two partners each with a Handy, they can each control the other’s by swapping keys manually, but there’s no automatic sync because The Handy doesn’t know about other devices by default; it’s more of a one-to-one remote control rather than two-way. With Kiiroo, if one person has, say, a Keon and the other has a Kiiroo Pearl (vibrator for her), the app can link them so that movements on one reflect on the other and vice versa in real time. This two-way interaction is something The Handy alone doesn’t offer (since there’s no female Handy device to pair with that way). So for a couple wanting a truly interactive experience (each feeling the other’s movements), Kiiroo is currently the option. For a one-way control (which is still a lot of fun), both systems work, though the Handy’s web control might be simpler in that your partner just needs a browser. With Kiiroo, your partner would likely download the app to control your toy (though Kiiroo also sometimes has a web control link feature via FeelConnect’s web, but it’s not as widely used).

Content and Scripts: Both communities have tons of interactive scripts for videos. The Handy community often uses websites like Synchronized or Mongo scripts repositories. Kiiroo users can use those same script files through the FeelConnect app or other software. In terms of official content, Kiiroo had partnerships with sites like FeelXVideos, Pornhub (in the past), etc., and often branded interactive content as “FeelMe” experiences. The Handy is catching up by offering an official script subscription. So, if you’re not into manually finding scripts, Kiiroo historically had an edge with official channels, but Handy is bridging that now. If you’re techy, either device can utilize the same vast library of user-created scripts (since those scripts can be played on either platform using the right app).

Ease of interactive use: For a casual user, one could argue Kiiroo’s app is a tad more user-friendly (all in one place on your phone). The Handy might require going to a website or loading a file into a player, which is not hard, just a bit less polished in presentation. However, the gap is not huge, and many average users have managed The Handy’s interactive features just fine, especially with tutorials available.

Ease of Use and Convenience

We touched on some of this, but to focus: if someone unboxes The Handy and Kiiroo side by side, which is easier to get going?

• Setup: The Handy requires you to plug it in (so find a power outlet). Kiiroo requires charging (or you can plug it in while using if it supports that – some devices can run when plugged in, others not; let’s assume you charged it first for portability). The Handy then might have a firmware update or wifi setup out of the box – that’s a one-time thing. Kiiroo might have a firmware update via app – also a one-time thing. The initial hurdle might be slightly higher for Handy due to WiFi configuration vs. just Bluetooth pairing for Kiiroo. But that’s fairly minor and only initially.

• Using Each Time: With Kiiroo Keon, you basically: ensure it’s charged, insert sleeve, lube up, turn on and either use manually or open the app if doing interactive. With The Handy: plug into outlet, slip sleeve under strap, tighten it, lube up, and either press the button or connect via phone/web for fancy features. Kiiroo is a tad quicker in that you don’t have to fuss with a strap and plug each time. The Handy’s strap tightening is not hard (there’s a calibration you can do so it remembers how far to move for a given strap position, which helps). But physically, it’s an extra step.

• During Use: The Handy being corded means you have to be mindful of the cable. If you’re moving around or adjusting position, that cable is attached. Some don’t mind, others find it limiting (imagine switching to hands-free – with Handy you’re always somewhat tethered to where the cord can reach; with Keon you could theoretically use it anywhere, like under covers, in a different room, outdoors if you wanted privacy, etc., since no cord). The flip side is The Handy never dies mid-session. Kiiroo’s battery could die if you forgot to charge it (nobody likes that surprise). Typically, Keon lasts a decent session or two, but heavy users must remember to charge.

• Cleaning up: Post-session, both have a sleeve to wash. The Handy’s strap might have gotten messy and might require a quick rinse (it’s waterproof silicone). Kiiroo’s device mouth might get some lube – just wipe it. Removing the sleeve: Kiiroo’s sleeve pops out easily; Handy’s you unstrap – trivial difference. Both sleeves then need drying. So cleaning is about equal effort, with Handy’s strap being an extra piece that occasionally needs cleaning.